For obvious reasons, white markings should be kept to a minimum. The small permissible "star" on the chest can become a blaze within a few generations, and, unfortunately, this has been proven to occur in Pharaoh Hounds. This drastically changes the total look of the breed and should be penalized. The white on the toes, while permissible, should not be "socks", nor should the permissible slim white snip on the center of the face become a blaze. The white "star" is not really a star shape. Therefore, a white patch on the chest or small streamers of white on the chest (and/or throat) are acceptable. While the white tip of the tail is highly desirable, more is not better, just flashier, and 3 inches of white on the tail is not merely a tip. Extra white is not more desirable. On the other hand, a lack of white tip is not incorrect. Neither of these conditions is listed as a fault, or is called undesirable. A dog should not win or lose by the marking on his tail. Flecking is a fault. Most serious, of course, is the disqualification as described in the Standard. If the integrity of the breed is to be maintained, one should adopt a conservative approach with respect to the amount of white considered permissible.